User-facing notes for each dimension. Output is advisory pre-review—not a substitute for school or advisor review. Checks may vary slightly by configuration and thesis type.
Rule-based checks against common school or GB/T-style expectations (heading levels, paragraph conventions, captions, headers/footers). You can add natural-language format notes in chat to steer format review.
Highlights possible reasoning gaps, weak evidence, or terminology drift across sections to help you self-edit before submission.
Consistency of citation style and completeness of bibliographic fields; optional web-assisted checks compare entries to public sources (coverage depends on data sources—verify critical references manually).
Flags paragraphs that may read overly templated or machine-like for you to rewrite; it is not an academic-misconduct determination.